When I stepped back to Mayflower for my attachment briefing today, our previous CT who took us under her wing last year was saying goodbye to us. It was the last day of her 38 year career.
My immediate impression was that she was finally free of her old life. I use the word ‘life’ because from knowing her the previous year, school was beyond the drudgeries of disciplining children, marking books etc; it was even beyond all the rewarding intrinsic stuff like pride that MOE sells us. It was most basically her life.
It seems that people of our day and for much time into the past have been used to wearing ‘uniforms’. This ‘uniform’, as one of my tutors said, is the profession that one takes, and extends into one’s life. By extension, I mean the principles (or lack of) and guiding ethos that most cannot shake off even after work.
In this day and age, we are fortunate that we have our choice of profession. Often, our character would be paired to our profession. Career, choice and character are spoken in the same breath. The brave join the army or become artistes, the meticulous become doctors or mastermind criminals, the people-people become teachers or join multi-level marketing. In the past and at places til now, jobs are paired by one’s social standing and family background. People are born slaves, forced to inherit businesses, sold to jobs. But I digress. My point is that jobs, with the advent of more human freedoms, now can run parallel with how we run our lives.
Where do the most commited and talented draw the line then? Does their dedication and gift mean they no longer have what they call a ‘normal’ life outside of work? Like for my today-retiring Mrs Ho, can they never change out of their uniform? She had realised this..
That’s when she decided to retire.
In reality, this brings to mind Japan’s PM Kozuimi’s (pardon my spelling, but I doubt he’s reading) visit to China and his visit to a Japanese shrine to honour his country’s dead soldiers. The Chinese screamed. He defended that he was visiting it as an individual rather than representing his country as the PM. There is a great divide of murky sea where one’s job end and the rights of an individual. Less remote from our reality: can a teacher smoke outside the school? Can one take off the uniform?
Haha, this is becoming Spiderman territory man..
Well for me I suppose it is what one thinks of one’s life and who or what he/she dedicates it to. Most of the heroic and the great spend their lives living their work. Most, to the point of obsession, and even beyond. Da Vinci’s code of living his life was not in search of ‘What is the meaning of life?’. Rather, it was ‘How can I make my life more meaningful?’. Thus I suppose we all have to dedicate our own lives to our own meaning. Keeping a home together as a homemaker needs as much dedication as an empire-maker.
And for Mrs Ho, she’s retiring to claim a new life that she deserves; that of caring for her three children. I hope she’ll be a good teacher to them.